Science chief urges researchers to enhance communication efforts

Holden Thorp, the editor-in-chief of a prominent global science journal, recently posed a thought-provoking challenge to the research community at Virginia Tech. During his visit to the Blacksburg and Roanoke campuses as a part of the Research Integrity and Consultation Program’s Research Integrity and Scholarly Excellence Lecture Series, Thorp emphasized the importance of communication in the scientific field.

Thorp highlighted the need for the science community to differentiate itself from other institutions that are experiencing a decline in public trust. He stressed the significance of being transparent and engaging in open dialogues, urging researchers to adopt a more conversational approach in their interactions with the public and the media.

Addressing the prevalent issue of dwindling public trust in the scientific community, Thorp referenced recent survey data indicating that science is still perceived as one of the most trustworthy institutions in society. According to a 2024 Pew Research Center study, 76 percent of U.S. adults express confidence in science, surpassing trust levels in religious leaders, public school principals, and elected officials.

During his lecture, Thorp shared valuable insights on building public trust in the scientific community. He advocated for acknowledging and rectifying mistakes, defending scientifically sound research papers, promptly sharing information, and refraining from criticizing those who may not fully comprehend the complexities of scientific research. Thorp emphasized the obligation of researchers, who utilize public funds for research, to engage with the public and address their concerns openly.

Iris Jenkins, the director of the Research Integrity and Consultation Program, lauded Thorp’s expertise in research and publishing ethics, underscoring the value of his perspectives for the Virginia Tech research community. The theme of the RISE series, focused on tackling 21st-century challenges in scientific research, aligns closely with Thorp’s extensive experience in navigating these issues.

Throughout his visit, Thorp engaged with various members of the Virginia Tech research community, exchanging ideas and insights on research integrity and publishing ethics. These interactions included discussions with researchers, postdoctoral associates, faculty members, and program directors, emphasizing the program’s commitment to providing comprehensive support for ethical research practices.

Jenkins highlighted the Research Integrity and Consultation Program’s dedication to promoting research excellence through consultations, training, and addressing ethical dilemmas. By offering assistance in regulatory compliance and navigating complex ethical issues, the program aims to empower researchers to succeed and uphold the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.

Holden Thorp’s visit to Virginia Tech served as a catalyst for fostering a culture of transparency, openness, and trust within the scientific community. By encouraging robust communication practices and ethical conduct, Thorp’s insights will undoubtedly resonate with researchers as they navigate the evolving landscape of scientific research.