Trump considering cuts to HUD, N.Y. housing advocates raise concerns about resulting impact
Affordable housing advocates in New York are expressing concern over potential impacts if the Trump administration proceeds with planned cuts to federal housing programs. The White House is reportedly looking into altering housing programs, such as the Section 8 initiative that aids low-income tenants in paying rent. Rachel Fee, the executive director of the New York Housing Conference, cautions that these modifications could lead to disorder in the housing market, affecting both renters and landlords. She predicts a surge in homelessness, housing instability, and heightened pressure on state and city authorities to manage the aftermath of these changes.
Over 1 million individuals in New York State rely on federal rental assistance for housing expenses, with approximately two-thirds comprising seniors, children, or individuals with disabilities. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities’ data highlights this dependency on federal aid for housing costs. New Destiny Housing, an organization in New York that helps domestic violence survivors secure affordable accommodation, closely monitors the White House’s actions. The nonprofit relies on HUD grants to fund its workforce. Nicole Branca, the CEO of New Destiny Housing, emphasizes the critical role of their staff in aiding survivors in securing housing. Without adequate staffing, their ability to assist survivors would be severely impacted, potentially resulting in them staying with abusers or in shelters.
A staff member at New Destiny Housing, Stephanie Woodbine, shares her perspective as a domestic violence survivor who benefits from the organization’s initiatives and relies on a separate HUD program to afford her apartment. She describes the feeling of uncertainty and anxiety due to the potential changes in federal housing programs. Any modifications to HUD programs would necessitate approval from Congress. Advocates remind us that Congress has previously thwarted HUD-related proposals put forth by Trump and express hope for similar actions in the future. The need for protection and support for vulnerable populations is paramount, with calls for Congressional intervention to safeguard those reliant on federal housing assistance.
Woodbine’s reliance on the Emergency Housing Voucher program underscores the significance of these federal programs in supporting individuals in precarious situations. Despite the uncertainties surrounding potential cuts to HUD programs, there is no official response from HUD regarding the proposed alterations. The White House budget office confirmed that final funding decisions are pending. Nicole Branca emphasizes the delicate balance between hope and anxiety, emphasizing the critical role of federal assistance programs in ensuring the safety and well-being of vulnerable populations. As the uncertainty persists, the resilience and determination of advocates and survivors like Stephanie Woodbine remain steadfast in advocating for continued support from Congress to protect those in need.